Chrome vs Firefox
Moderator: Turky
-
GUARD!AN
- Soup Eater
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 3:41 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Contact:
Chrome vs Firefox
Thoughts?
GUARD!AN
–noun
1. guarding; protecting: a guardian deity.
2. a violent, tropical, cyclonic storm of the western North Atlantic, having wind
speeds of or in excess of 72 mph (32 m/sec).
3. (in Gnosticism) one of a class of powers or beings conceived as emanating
from the Supreme Being and performing various functions in the operations of
the universe.
4. a terrifying dream in which the dreamer experiences feelings of helplessness,
extreme anxiety, sorrow, etc.
5. The sensation and muscular spasm caused by an electric current passing
through the body or a body part.
–noun
1. guarding; protecting: a guardian deity.
2. a violent, tropical, cyclonic storm of the western North Atlantic, having wind
speeds of or in excess of 72 mph (32 m/sec).
3. (in Gnosticism) one of a class of powers or beings conceived as emanating
from the Supreme Being and performing various functions in the operations of
the universe.
4. a terrifying dream in which the dreamer experiences feelings of helplessness,
extreme anxiety, sorrow, etc.
5. The sensation and muscular spasm caused by an electric current passing
through the body or a body part.
Re: Chrome vs Firefox
Firefox imo.
Chrome on a low end machine, if you can handle only using one tab at a time. Chrome is faster and uses less resources than Firefox, but only if you have just the one tab open. Chrome is more stable because it creates a new process for each tab, but it takes up more resources for every tab each time you open a new one.
Firefox has the better addons and more of them and is a decent time quicker and more resource friendly than Chrome if you have say 5 or more tabs open at the same time you can actually notice some difference. Firefox is more user friendly and generally more accessible.
CONCLUSION: yews Firefox unless you have a slow computer, but then only open 1 or 2 tabs at a time or you might as well yews Firefox.
Chrome on a low end machine, if you can handle only using one tab at a time. Chrome is faster and uses less resources than Firefox, but only if you have just the one tab open. Chrome is more stable because it creates a new process for each tab, but it takes up more resources for every tab each time you open a new one.
Firefox has the better addons and more of them and is a decent time quicker and more resource friendly than Chrome if you have say 5 or more tabs open at the same time you can actually notice some difference. Firefox is more user friendly and generally more accessible.
CONCLUSION: yews Firefox unless you have a slow computer, but then only open 1 or 2 tabs at a time or you might as well yews Firefox.
Less QQ more Pew Pew
Re: Chrome vs Firefox
Firefox
Last edited by Sith on Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Chrome vs Firefox
Firefox is only better if you need the addons.
If you browse minimalistically, chrome can't be beat. If you need all of those worthless gadgets, get firefox.
If you browse minimalistically, chrome can't be beat. If you need all of those worthless gadgets, get firefox.
Hi. I'm angry on the internet.
Re: Chrome vs Firefox
Hmm, some of them aren't worthless imo. But the ones that are useful or safer to yews are usually available on both Chrome and Firefox.
Less QQ more Pew Pew
Re: Chrome vs Firefox
I yews my internet browser to browse the internet. Not much has changed with my needs since I first started doing so in 1998. Tabs are great - that's about it. Adblock intrigued me, but after so long I've pretty much learned to simply ignore the adverts anyway.Laser wrote:Hmm, some of them aren't worthless imo. But the ones that are useful or safer to yews are usually available on both Chrome and Firefox.
Hi. I'm angry on the internet.
Re: Chrome vs Firefox
I find NoScript pretty decent, especially if you're on an unknown website or you hate ads which slow the browser.
Less QQ more Pew Pew
-
Max Rambone
- Ramboner
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:55 am