proposed wook trick rule

Discuss the pug server Impulse.
Turky
dude weighs like 90 pounds
Posts: 3012
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 4:32 pm
Location: the great communist world of china

proposed wook trick rule

Post by Turky »

Said this in vent already, so some already disagree, but how about this...

If the first attacking team uses wook trick for the first objective, then the second team can do it as well.

If the first team doesn't, regardless if they even get the objective, then the second team can't either. If the second team still manages to complete it, then obviously they win the round (e-penis points etc).

What do you guys think?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Duo
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 3:36 pm
Location: Chile

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Duo »

No. The way it is is fine. Declare if it's allowed before the game starts. If nothing is said, then it's allowed. No reason to change it when it works just fine.
Image
Kerafym
jkb's bro & svail's fiend
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:07 pm

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Kerafym »

Just because the first team doesn't choose to yews all of the advantages available to them, doesn't mean that the second team should have to be pigeon-holed into playing with the same set of disadvantages.
Hi. I'm angry on the internet.
User avatar
Laser
Kopite
Posts: 2326
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:15 am

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Laser »

Tbh why change it, I agree with kera on this one.
Less QQ more Pew Pew
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Ýô
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 1:47 pm

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Ýô »

hm turk sounds quite fair, but why not start a poll to allow/forbide it lol?

anyways, for what ive seen in my short experience in cargo, 2nd obj is a fag, even with wookie trick, its a respawn spam feast of rockets, detpacks and easy sniping, its a midget door crap tbh
Kerafym
jkb's bro & svail's fiend
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:07 pm

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Kerafym »

It's also really really easy to get past if you're A.) Not playing 2s and B.) Know how to time objectives.
Hi. I'm angry on the internet.
User avatar
Max Rambone
Ramboner
Posts: 2662
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:55 am

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Max Rambone »

Turkey's team didn't really choose not to yews it....

A reborn boss rushed and got it before the D could stop him and they didn't have to yews it.

~archi
Eventus stultorum magister.
Turky
dude weighs like 90 pounds
Posts: 3012
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 4:32 pm
Location: the great communist world of china

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by Turky »

Max Rambone wrote:Turkey's team didn't really choose not to yews it....

A reborn boss rushed and got it before the D could stop him and they didn't have to yews it.
point is it wasn't needed. with proper teamwork and coordination (and/or sufficient negligence on the defender's part), wook trick is not needed at the second objective.
Image
Image
Image
dadeus
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:16 pm

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by dadeus »

:mrgreen: Isn't the real answer simple...kill the wookie
wafflz
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 8:52 pm

Re: proposed wook trick rule

Post by wafflz »

Max Rambone wrote:Turkey's team didn't really choose not to yews it....

A reborn boss rushed and got it before the D could stop him and they didn't have to yews it.

~archi

my bad ^_^
Image
Image
Post Reply