Page 2 of 5

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:42 pm
by Ýô
well kataline aka katy, is rly a woman, shes bout 27-28 years old and has two sons, she posted in smc a pic of one of them... katie, lauren, aries, i guess there would be more

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:47 pm
by Duo
Ýô wrote:does it matter that we are in the same clan, in a real clanwar only best players play
Correction: in a match only the best players play. In a scrim it's just a spontaneous thing and whoever is online at the time comes to play. Though this makes no difference, because you bitch about "stax" in 4s and 5s scrims too.
stop sucking my dick on xfire to come
Sucking up to you is usually the only way to get you to come play since you usually complain about "stax" and refuse to play unless I rub your e-balls for you.
did i complain abot stax yesterday?
Yes, you did. Had I known you were going to be stricken with amnesia today, I would have taken a screenshot. You literally said the word "stax" as a message in Xfire when I asked you to come play.
i like my clan, and i love my clanmates
Then play with them and quit bitching about stax.
PCC is only made by nerdfags with no life
Disregarding the fact that this is (erroneously) the single most common argument noobs make when getting owned on the internet(YOU SPEND MORE TIME DOING X THAN ME, THEREFORE YOUR ARGUMENTS RELATED TO X ARE INVALID), I'm in college and on summer break. What about you?

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:58 pm
by Ýô
same sittuation (uni) and free

my last reply to you

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:10 pm
by Darth_Wayne
CLANWAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

o w8 it woz just a funwar

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:16 pm
by GUARD!AN
Darth_Wayne wrote:CLANWAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

o w8 it woz just a funwar
rofl.


Guys, regardless of who was doing what, when I connected to the server, what I saw was pathetic. Even if Wufie and Yo weren't playing "fair", laming doors is taking it a little too far just to prove a point.

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:04 pm
by tens0r
2v2!

Yo will be my partner since you hate him so much. And since you don't like DJ much or 2s we'll throw DJ in there and make it a 3v3.

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:04 pm
by Max Rambone
GUARD!AN wrote:laming doors
What is this? Greening the doors after the enemy goes through them?

Or switching to the other team to do it?

~archi

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:05 pm
by Turky
GUARD!AN wrote:
Darth_Wayne wrote:CLANWAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

o w8 it woz just a funwar
rofl.


Guys, regardless of who was doing what, when I connected to the server, what I saw was pathetic. Even if Wufie and Yo weren't playing "fair", laming doors is taking it a little too far just to prove a point.
it's kera/wafflz/duo, how could you not expect something like that?

they always make up their own rules. let's lame the lift and find an excuse for it every time. let's join the other team and let the enemy through (actually watched kera join our team for that, and he did not sk so it wasn't a classbind conflict). let's spam for a whole round in retaliation for one isolated 4v1 incident when the 1 player is frozen.

Or, let's q3fill the server when people get banned for no reason, because that's what ALWAYS happens when people are banned for no reason, right?




Don't worry, I remember when you faggots were trying to "ban me from siege" just because you didn't like me, then boycotted Impulse like little children when you didn't get your way.

Did we see OTHER people acting like little children and flooding the server when I was banned?

Nope.

Why not? Because in reality, the only little children were the ones who wanted me banned.

So what makes Duo and his buddies so special? I'd be fascinated to hear the explanation.




Is this what's supposed to be defined as "fun?" Because from what I'm gathering, having that combination of people around is almost never fun.

But I will admit, wafflz gets himself into much less trouble when neither of the other two are around.

That aside... I'm starting to see a trend here, I've got a feeling I'm not the only one who sees it, and I'm not liking it at all.

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:24 pm
by Duo
»juliet]ex wrote:(|^_^|) I HAS HEADPHONES I CAN'T HEAR TURKEY CRYING

Re: Retaliating Against "Spam"

Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:30 pm
by Turky
Judging from that post as well as the one that told me to "fuck off," I'll take that as a "No further questions, your honor."