It's an interesting take.Turky wrote:I prefer Dan Brown's take on it:Roflraptor wrote:It's odd you say that. I've been watching a bit of Carl Sagan's Cosmos lately, when I've had a bit of free time (I know, who watches educational videos in their free time for the fun of it?). I really enjoyed his views on astrobiology and his explanation of it, not to mention everything else in that series.Turky wrote:Speaking of biological lifeforms...Roflraptor wrote:Uh... probably not for at least two weeks. I have two mid-trimester tests which uncannily occur on the same day the week after next week. One of them is for an introductory anatomy and physiology unit so there's quite a bit of study to be done.piipe wrote:so... when i will see u on impulse???
Another? I'm not alone?Turquoise Dragon wrote:Another biological guy, huh? You'll have fun.Roflraptor wrote:Biomedical science. It's early days yet but really enjoying it at the moment.GUARD!AN wrote:Raptor, what are you studying at Uni?
I believe that WE are not alone![]()
(in this universe that is)
"Mathematics requires it."
In other words, it is, quite arguably, statistically impossible for us to be the only star system with a life-bearing planet.
ps: woo, Cosmos is streamable on netflix
I think the more interesting question is how many other civilisations might currently exist with similar or better technolgical capability compared to that of our own, if there are any at all.








